Advertisment Nexovas Cilnidipine
Indian Journal of Nephrology About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Current Issue | Archives| Ahead of print | Search |Instructions |  Editorial Board  

Users Online:1335

Official publication of the Indian Society of Nephrology
  Search
 
 ~ Next article
 ~ Previous article 
 ~ Table of Contents
  
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~  Article in PDF (284 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed937    
    Printed59    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded81    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 173-174
 

Authors' reply


1 Department of Nephrology, AHERF, Delhi, India
2 Department of Nephrology, Fortis Hospitals, India
3 Department of Nephrology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, Delhi, India
4 Department of Immunology and Molecular Biology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication22-Jan-2010

Correspondence Address:
S Jasuja
Department of Nephrology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, Room no. 1952, -2 basements (X-Knife), Sarita Vihar, Delhi Mathura Road, Delhi-110 076
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 20535258

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Jasuja S, Gupta A K, Choudhry R, Kher V, Aggarwal D K, Mishra A, Agarwal M, Sarin A, Mishra M K, Raina V. Authors' reply. Indian J Nephrol 2009;19:173-4

How to cite this URL:
Jasuja S, Gupta A K, Choudhry R, Kher V, Aggarwal D K, Mishra A, Agarwal M, Sarin A, Mishra M K, Raina V. Authors' reply. Indian J Nephrol [serial online] 2009 [cited 2019 May 25];19:173-4. Available from: http://www.indianjnephrol.org/text.asp?2009/19/4/173/59344


Sir,

We appreciate the critical comments made by Dr. Agarwal. [1] The highlight of our article is that approximately 30% of patients in dialysis will not be diagnosed HCV+ve with the currently available 3 rd generation Elisa. [2]

We will try to clarify the points raised as they appear in the letter to the editor.

  1. We agree that there is significant literature available on HCV from Indian centers. However, most of these do not utilize HCV RNA for diagnosis. We related our observations to studies using similar techniques based on PCR. Majority of the references quoted are out of context because of methodology, [5],[6],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[14] non-relevant group studies [7],[15],[16],[17] or review article. [13]
  2. Duration of ESKD/ESRD, whether on HD or renal transplant, is a risk factor for HCV. [3],[4],[18]
  3. On treatment, HCV patients are excluded because this may affect results of HCV PCR. In fact, some positive patients on treatment were HCV RNA negative at the time of our study. (These were not part of the study)
  4. We do not separate HCV patients but follow universal precautions, while HCV dialyzers are reprocessed in a separate area. However, this has not been the focus of our article.
  5. This study looks at point prevalence of HCV and was neither prospective nor retrospective. This was done in 2005 over a two-week period.
  6. The numbers in the table I reflect not the doses but the number of courses taken by the patients. Twice or more vaccination implies repeating the entire vaccination schedule comprising of four doses, each time twice or more. We agree that hepatitis B vaccination does not in any way affect HCV prevalence. We purely mentioned it as another variable associated with population under study.
  7. Refer to point 5.
  8. Duration of CKD was estimated by the history recall and patient records.
  9. Since our study was neither longitudinal nor cohort, it is not possible to calculate the probability of an individual that the reader suggested from this data. The prevalence of HCV positivity was 7.4% in patients who had duration of dialysis less than or equal to 16 months and prevalence of HCV positive is 45.2% for those who had more than 16 months of duration of dialysis. The change in prevalence from 7.4% to 45.2% was not in just one month. ROC curve is appropriate here, because duration of dialysis can be used as diagnostic tool for HCV. The sum of sensitivity and specificity at cut-off more than 16 months was higher; sensitivity (87.5%) and specificity (60%) seems appropriate.
  10. The multivariable logistic regression was used to find the potential risk factors for HCV positivity and duration of dialysis was one of the potential risk factor. The results showed one month increase in duration of dialysis, increased odds 1.06 times to have HCV RNA positivity after adjusted for other potential risk factors.
  11. Anti tubercular drugs and their effects were not looked into.
  12. ALT has been used as a surrogate marker for HCV infection though its correlation has been poor. In our study, low serum albumin, high ALT were significant correlates for HCV RNA positivity. In fact, the normal cut offs for ALT in dialysis patients is much lower than that amongst non-dialysis patients. It only suggests that those with higher ALT had higher chances of HCV RNA positivity.
  13. CDC does not recommend isolation of HCV+ve patients. We in our unit also do not isolate patients. We have not made any comments on whether it should be recommended or not. It is a matter of debate in the literature too. This has also not been the focus of our article.


 
  References Top

1.Agarwal SK. Prevalence and association of hepatitis C viremia in Hemodialysis Patients at a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Nephrol 2009;19:172-3.  Back to cited text no. 1    Medknow Journal  
2.Jasuja S, Gupta AK, Choudhary R, Kher V, Agarwal DK, Misra A, et al. Prevalence and association of hepatitis C viremia in hemodialysis patients at a tertiary care hospital. Ind J Nephrology 2009;19:62-8.  Back to cited text no. 2      
3.Fissell RB, Bragg-Gresham JL, Woods JD, Jadoul M, Gillespie B, Hedderwick SA, et al. Patterns of hepatitis C prevalence and seroconversion in hemodialysis units from three continents: the DOPPS. Kidney Int 2004;65:2335-42.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
4.Pereira BJ, Wright TL, Schmid CH, Levey AS. A controlled study of hepatitis C transmission by organ transplantation. The New England Organ Bank Hepatitis C Study Group. Lancet 1995;345:484.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Medhi S, Potukuchi SK, Polipalli SK, Swargiary SS, Deka P, Chaudhary A, et al. Diagnostic utility of hepatitis C virus core antigen in hemodialysis patients. ClinBiochem 2008;41:447-52.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.Lakshmi V, Reddy AK, Dakshinamurty KV. Evaluation of commercially available third-generation anti-hepatitis C virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in patients on hemodialysis. Indian J Med Microbiol 2007;25:140-2.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
7.Jindal N, Jindal M, Jilani N, Kar P. Seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in health care workers of a tertiary care centre in New Delhi. Indian J Med Res 2006;123:179-80.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
8.Reddy AK, Dakshinamurty KV, Lakshmi V. Utility of HCV core antigen ELISA in the screening for hepatitis C virus infection in patients on hemodialysis. Indian J Med Microbiol 2006;24:55-7.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
9.Chattopadhyay S, Rao S, Das BC, Singh NP, Kar P. Prevalence of transfusion-transmitted virus infection in patients on maintainance hemodialysis from New Delhi, India. Hemodial Int 2005;9:362-6.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
10.Reddy AK, Murthy KV, Lakshmi V. Prevalence of HCV infection in patients on hemodialysis: survey by antibody and core antigen detection. Indian J Med Microbiol 2005;23:106-10.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
11.Reddy GA, Dakshinamurthy KV, Neelaprasad P, Gangadhar T, Lakshmi V. Prevalence of HBV and HCV dual infection in patients on hemodialysis. Indian J Med Microbiol 2005;23:41-3.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
12.Chandra M, Khaja MN, Hussain MM, Poduri CD, Farees N, Habeeb MA, et al. Prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C viral infections in Indian patients with chronic renal failure. Intervirology 2004;47:374-6.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
13.Saha D, Agarwal SK. Hepatitis and HIV infection during hemodialysis. J Indian Med Assoc 2001;99:194-9, 203, 213.  Back to cited text no. 13  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
14.Agarwal SK, Dash SC, Irshad M. Hepatitis C virus infection during hemodialysis in India. J Assoc Physicians India 1999;47:1139-43.  Back to cited text no. 14  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
15.Gosavi MS, Shah SK, Shah SR, Pal RB, Saldanha JA, Banker DD. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Mumbai. Indian J Med Sci 1997;51:378-85.  Back to cited text no. 15  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
16.Jaiswal SP, Chitnis DS, Naik G, Artwani KK, Pandit CS, Salgia P, et al. Prevalence of anti HCV antibodies in central India. Indian J Med Res 1996;104:177-81.  Back to cited text no. 16  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
17.Arankalle VA, Chadha MS, Jha J, Amrapurkar DN, Banerjee K. Prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies in western India. Indian J Med Res 1995;101:91-3.  Back to cited text no. 17  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
18.Tsui JI, Vittinghoff E, Shlipak MG, Bertenthal D, Inadomi J, Rodriguez RA, et al. Association of hepatitis c seropositivity with increased risk for developing end-stage renal disease. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1271-6.  Back to cited text no. 18  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

Indian Journal of Nephrology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 20th Sept '07