Advertisment Nexovas Cilnidipine
Indian Journal of Nephrology About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Current Issue | Archives| Ahead of print | Search |Instructions |  Editorial Board  

Users Online:777

Official publication of the Indian Society of Nephrology
  Search
 
  
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~Related articles
 ~  Article in PDF (405 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and Me...
  Results
  Discussion
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2844    
    Printed105    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded311    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 5-11
 

Clinical features, epidemiology, and short-term outcomes of proliferative lupus nephritis in Eastern India


1 Department of Nephrology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Department of Rheumatology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Date of Web Publication16-Feb-2013

Correspondence Address:
D Sircar
118/3B, B.L.T. Road, Kolkata - 700 060, West Bengal
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-4065.107187

Rights and Permissions

  Abstract 

Race and ethnicity are important predictors of prognosis in lupus nephritis. This study was conducted to determine the clinical features, epidemiological profile, and short-term outcomes in patients of lupus nephritis from a single center in Eastern India. A total of 86 patients of class III/IV lupus nephritis were studied. Seventy-eight of them received cyclophosphamide for induction and eight of them received mycophenolate. The patients were evaluated for response, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and proteinuria at 6 months. About 44% patients had a partial or complete response at 6 months and 64% at 1 year. The factors correlating with response at 6 months were older age at diagnosis, hypertension, activity, and chronicity indices and duration of symptoms prior to therapy. Chronicity index and hypertension were the predictors of response by logistic regression at 6 months. Compared to the Caucasian and African American patients, patients with proliferative lupus in Eastern India presented with a lower eGFR, lower proteinuria, and higher chronicity scores. Older age at diagnosis, hypertension, activity, chronicity indices, and duration of symptoms correlated with response. Short-term outcomes were similar to those described in Caucasian patients.


Keywords: Lupus nephritis, prognostic markers, race, remission, short term


How to cite this article:
Sircar D, Sircar G, Waikhom R, Raychowdhury A, Pandey R. Clinical features, epidemiology, and short-term outcomes of proliferative lupus nephritis in Eastern India. Indian J Nephrol 2013;23:5-11

How to cite this URL:
Sircar D, Sircar G, Waikhom R, Raychowdhury A, Pandey R. Clinical features, epidemiology, and short-term outcomes of proliferative lupus nephritis in Eastern India. Indian J Nephrol [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 May 26];23:5-11. Available from: http://www.indianjnephrol.org/text.asp?2013/23/1/5/107187



  Introduction Top


Renal involvement is a serious complication of systemic lupus erythematosus, and proliferative lupus nephritis (WHO classes III and IV) has poor outcomes. [1] With the advent of induction therapy with cyclophosphamide, the survival of patients has improved, with 5-year survival for class IV lupus nephritis at 82%. [2] 25-30% of patients of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis will reach end-stage renal disease (ESRD) over 20 years of follow-up. [2]

Race has been shown to predict outcomes in lupus nephritis. Black patients have an increased frequency of lupus nephritis and worse survival rates. [3],[4] Hispanic patients have increased disease activity, and 6-year renal survival is only 50%. [4] Studies on Asian patients suggested that they have an increased risk of developing lupus nephritis, [5] although the long- term outcomes are similar to white patients. [6] These reports are from an Oriental population; patients from South Asia were not well represented. A cohort of SLE patients from Pakistan was found to have a 5-year survival of 80%. Organ damage (including nephritis) was present in 76% of the patients in this cohort. [7]

The other factors which determine the outcomes are male gender, younger age, higher baseline creatinine, low socioeconomic status, nephrotic syndrome at presentation, resistant nephritic syndrome, severe anemia, hypertension, low levels of complement, anti-phospholipid antibodies, class IV histology, high activity and chronicity index, and treatment type. [5],[8],[9],[10],[11]

Chronic changes that occur as a result of delay in diagnosis and therapy are an important cause for failure to remit. [12] Patients who fail to achieve remission are at a higher risk of flares, (and flares of greater severity), and worse patient and renal survival. Patient survival is 95% in those who achieve remission, and 60% in those who do not; renal survival is 94% and 31% respectively. [10] Patients who achieve a partial remission have a six-fold higher risk of relapse than those who achieve complete remission. [6]

In the current study, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of lupus patients who had diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis, and presented to the Department of Nephrology in the Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India, between 2008 and 2010. These patients were treated with an induction protocol of IV pulse cyclophosphamide monthly for at least 6 months. Prognostic factors for response were assessed by both correlation and regression.


  Materials and Methods Top


A total of 86 patients of class III/IV lupus nephritis, [13] had attended the OPD of the department of Nephrology from June 2008 to June 2010. All the patients were followed-up for more than 6 months. Patients who were deemed to be in ESRD and those in whom 6 months of therapy could not be administered (due to infection, development of ESRD or death) were excluded. All ages were considered for inclusion. Active lupus nephritis was defined by urine RBC >5/hpf or RBC/WBC/granular casts in the urine, proteinuria of more than 0.5 gm/day, and biopsy-proven renal disease. Renal biopsies were categorized according to WHO/ISN/RPS classification and activity and chronicity indices were noted. [14]

All the patients received induction therapy with intravenous pulse methylprednisolone (1000 mg once daily for three days). Seventy-eight patients received induction with monthly intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide, 750 mg/m 2 body surface area, the dose adjusted to a maximum of 1 g/m 2 based on nadir leucocyte counts (to be kept above 3000/cu mm) done on the tenth day following administration. Dosage was adjusted to renal function, with a 25% reduction in dose for an eGFR of <15 ml/min. All the patients received oral prednisone, (1 mg/kg/day) for six weeks and then gradually tapered, according to clinical improvement, by 10 mg/week to a maintenance dose of 5-7.5 mg/day. Eight patients received induction with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), 500 mg three times daily, along with prednisone. All the patients received hydroxychloroquine, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Renal flares were treated with increasing oral prednisone or additional IV methylprednisolone pulses as required. Mesna was administered with cyclophosphamide and all the patients were given cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for the first 6 months.

36 of the 77 female patients were sexually active and were advised barrier contraception. They were counseled regarding the risks inherent to lupus in pregnancy and all of them agreed to defer pregnancy till disease quiescence.

The primary outcome measure was complete response (CR). This was defined, according to the EULAR consensus statement, [15] as inactive urinary sediment, a decrease in proteinuria to ≤0.2 g per day and normal or stable renal function. A partial response (PR) was defined as inactive urinary sediment, proteinuria ≤0.5 g per day, and normal or stable (if previously abnormal) GFR. Treatment failure was defined as any of the following - proteinuria of more than 3gm/day, a rise in creatinine of >0.6 mg/dl above the baseline, estimated GFR dropping to below 15% of the baseline value, or discontinuation of treatment due to side effects. [15],[16] Renal relapses were considered to be present if any of the following occurred (1) increase of proteinuria by 0.5 g/day to a value more than 1g/day in a patient previously in PR or CR (2) recurrence of active sediment (3) a decrease in estimated GFR by 30 ml/min. For those patients who had a proteinuria of >0.5 gm and <3 gm/day, and did not fit into either definitions of failure or remission, we defined them as with continuing disease activity.

Patients attended the out-patient department every two weeks for the first 6 months, then monthly for another 3 months and 2-monthly till the end of the study period. At each visit, blood pressure, SLEDAI scores, and occurrence of adverse events were noted. Laboratory tests done were 24-h protein excretion, C3, lipid profile, anti-dsDNA at baseline and at 6-monthly intervals. A complete hemogram, fasting sugar, liver function tests, urea, and creatinine were carried out at monthly intervals for the first 6 months and then with every visit. Estimated GFR (eGFR) was calculated from the MDRD equation (using three variables) for patients with age >16 years and the Schwartz equation [17] for patients at and below 16 years of age.

Secondary end points included partial response, any response (complete or partial), eGFRs, and proteinuria at 6 months and 1 year, adverse effects, renal relapses, treatment failures, progression to ESRD, or death.

Descriptive statistics are reported as frequency and percentage for categorical variables and as mean and standard deviation for continuous variables. One-way ANOVA was carried out to detect the differences, if any, in the baseline clinical and laboratory (continuous) variables among patients with partial, complete, or no responses at 6 months. Similarly, Chi square test was carried out to detect differences in categorical variables in the same groups. Pearson's and point bi-serial correlations were carried out to find out the relationship between eGFR, proteinuria, and response at 6 months and baseline, clinical, and laboratory values. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was carried out to detect predictors of outcome at 6 months in terms of proteinuria and eGFR. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine predictors of complete, partial and no remission.


  Results Top


Baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients are given in [Table 1] and [Table 2]. Mean follow-up of these patients was 13 months. Arthritis (79%), rash (64%), and fever (66%) were the most common manifestations at onset. The mean duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis was 13.9 months.

At 6 months, 18/86 (20.9%) patients were in partial response, 20 (23.3%) patients in complete response, and 12 (14%) patients were in treatment failure. The remaining 41.8% patients had continued disease activity but had reached neither end point yet. Three patients went into ESRD within 6 months of the onset of the induction period. Average time to achieve complete remission was 4.5 (±1.9) months and to achieve partial remission was 3.9 (±2.2 months). The time to achieve response did not correlate with the renal function and maintenance of response at 1 year. There were no differences in outcomes detectable in the three treatment groups at 1 year.
Table 1: Baseline clinical characteristics of 86 patients

Click here to view
Table 2: Baseline laboratory values in patients

Click here to view


Forty-one of 86 patients (47.7%) had a low C3 at onset of which nine patients had a normalization of C3 levels at 1 month and 62 (72%) had a normal C3 level at 6 months. However, the C3 levels did not correlate with remission, and neither did normalization of C3 levels predict renal response.

Fifty-two of 86 patients presented with a baseline creatinine of <1.4 mg/dl, 14 (26.9%) of them achieved a complete response, and 13 patients (25%) a partial response at 6 months. Sixteen patients presented with a baseline creatinine of ≥2.5 mg/dl, of them four patients (25%) achieved a partial response, and one patient (6%) a complete response at 6 months. The presenting creatinine showed a trend toward a correlation with the response but did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.77).

Nine patients (10.5%) presented with an eGFR between 15-30 ml/min, and 7 (8%) patients presented with an eGFR of <15 ml/min. Five of them required dialysis at presentation. At 6 months, one patient among those presenting with an eGFR of <15 ml/min, achieved partial remission and three patients among them were in treatment failure; two developed end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in spite of 6 months of treatment with cyclophosphamide.

On one-way ANOVA [Table 3], there were significant differences in the baseline chronicity indices and the duration of symptoms prior to therapy, among patients with no, partial, or complete response. Patients with complete responses had a lower chronicity score and a shorter delay in treatment compared to patients with no response ( P < 0.05). The baseline proteinuria correlated with the eGFR at 6 months ( P = 0.009) and showed a trend with respect to attainment of complete or partial response ( P = 0.091). There was a trend toward higher baseline hemoglobin levels in patients of complete response ( P = 0.053). Presence of hypertension and leukopenia at the baseline was less likely in patients of complete or partial responses ( P = 0.036 and 0.027 respectively). There was a trend toward the presence of nephrotic syndrome in non-responders ( P = 0.077). There were no differences in the age at diagnosis, eGFR, gender, clinical features (arthritis, rash, oral ulcers, CNS disease, serositis, photosensitivity), C3 levels, serum albumin, biopsy class, or therapy in patients with no, partial, or complete remission. The class of biopsy (class III or IV) did not correlate with the response. The baseline and subsequent SLEDAI scores (done at monthly intervals) did not correlate with the response.
Table 3: One way ANOVA between important baseline clinical and laboratory variables and patients categorized into no, partial and complete response

Click here to view


There was a significant correlation between eGFR at 6 months and age at diagnosis, hypertension, proteinuria, baseline renal function, percentage of glomeruli in the biopsy specimen containing the crescents, activity, and chronicity indices [Table 3]. Proteinuria at 6 months correlated with the chronicity index and hypertension. Response at 6 months correlated with age at diagnosis, hypertension, activity, chronicity indices, and duration of symptoms [Table 4]. The specific treatment given with mycophenolate or cyclophosphamide did not correlate with any of the outcome variables.
Table 4: Pearson's and point bi-serial correlation between outcomes and baseline variables

Click here to view


Stepwise multiple linear regressions were carried out with the aim to detect the predictors of eGFR at 6 months. In the final model, eGFR at baseline, chronicity index, and age at diagnosis were predictive of eGFR at 6 months, with an R 2 of 0.521. Logistic regression analysis at 6 months, for any response (partial or complete), detected the absence of hypertension (Beta = 0.940, standard error = 0.465, P = 0.044) and chronicity index (beta = -0.330, standard error = 0.163, P = 0.043) as predictors. R 2 (Nagelkerke) was 0.166.

There were no renal flares in the first 6 months of follow-up. Among the patients followed-up beyond 6 months, renal flares occurred in 2/42 patients (4.8%) in the 1 st year and both were characterized by an increase in proteinuria but no active sediment. The time to flare was nine months in one patient and 11.5 months in the other. They responded to treatment, and went into remission by the 2 nd year. Two of 26 patients (7.7%) had flares in the 2 nd year, at 13 and 18 months respectively; these were also characterized only by the presence of proteinuria.

CNS involvement was present in 11/86 (12.8%) patients. Leucopenia was present in four patients, thrombocytopenia in eight patients (no overlap). Two or more organ-involvement was present in 17 (19.7%) patients. Presence of other organ involvement did not influence the renal response.

Twenty-two patients (25.6%) had mild infections within the first 6 months of therapy; 16 (18.6%) patients had severe infections requiring admission. One patient (male) developed disseminated tuberculosis; the majority of the rest were pneumonias. Incidence of severe infections decreased over the next 2 years, with two patients (4.9%) at 1 year and none at 2 years. Mild infections continued to occur; 13/42 patients (30%) had the infections in the 1 st year and 13/26 patients in the 2 nd year (50%). Nine patients (10.5%) developed amenorrhea, although, it subsequently improved in four of them with continuation of pulse cyclophosphamide - suggesting that disease activity may be a cause for amenorrhea in them. Three patients developed amenorrhea in the 1 st year and none in the 2 nd year. One patient developed a vertebral fracture after 15 months on corticosteroids. There were no deaths during this follow-up period.


  Discussion Top


There has been a considerable improvement in the survival of patients with lupus nephritis, which has been attributed to an increased awareness, earlier referral to nephrologists, effectiveness of newer induction regimens, and an overall improvement in medical care. Various trials and studies comparing the outcomes in lupus nephritis have been confounded by the differences in histology (classes III, IV and V lesions), different treatment regimens, and different criteria for remission, relapse, and flare. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for remission are a composite of estimated GFR of >90 ml/min, urinary protein to creatinine ratio <0.2 mg/mg, and inactive urinary sediment. [18] Inducing complete remission (including a normal renal function) is extremely difficult to achieve, especially in patients with higher chronicity indices. The EULAR response criteria, which have been adopted for this study, specify that a normal or stable GFR is acceptable for both complete and partial response. [15] Patients with refractory disease have been defined by the NIH as those who show no response to treatment and those in whom proteinuria does not decrease to less than half of pretreatment value or to <3 g per day and who have persistent active urinary casts or deterioration in serum creatinine level. [19]

Compared to the Caucasian [20] and African American patients, [21] the patients in the present study had a higher creatinine level but a lower degree of proteinuria at baseline. They also had a younger age at onset and lower activity, but higher chronicity indices on renal biopsy. [20]

The rates of response, in our patients, have been 21% and 23% at 6 months for CR and PR respectively. At 6 months, 53% patients in the cyclophosphamide arm of the ALMS study [22] reached the primary efficacy end point. This was defined as a decrease in urine protein/creatinine ratio (P/Cr), calculated from a 24-h urine collection, to <3 in patients with baseline nephrotic range P/Cr (≥3), or by ≥50% in patients with subnephrotic baseline P/Cr (<3). [23] A greater percentage of patients reached a response (partial or complete) at the end of the 1 st year on follow-up (64%). In comparison, long-term follow-up of Chinese patients revealed a complete or at least partial response rate of 55% and 82%. [24] The figures for European Caucasian population were 62 and 88% in one study. [25] Median time to remission is usually longer than 6 months. [10],[26]

Our patients had an average delay of 14 months from the onset of the disease to the initiation of therapy, and this delay was more in patients who achieved no response versus those who achieved complete response - this is a known cause for refractory disease. [12]

A decrease in proteinuria is often a marker for better renal outcomes. In our patients, response was associated with a non-significant trend toward lesser degrees of proteinuria ( P = 0.055). In the long-term outcomes of the Euro-Lupus cohort, it was demonstrated by multivariate analysis that early response to therapy, by 6 months, (defined as a decline in creatinine and a decrease in proteinuria at 6 months to less than 1 gm/day) was the best predictor of long-term outcomes. [27]

A younger age at diagnosis is considered to be a poor prognostic marker. In our study, the age of patients at diagnosis ranged from 5 to 48 years. Ten patients were less than 12 years of age at the time of diagnosis. Over this age range, the age at diagnosis (as well as the present age) was negatively correlated with response and eGFR at 6 months. This may have been due to a longer latency for treatment in those of older age. Other markers of poor prognosis - hypertension, renal impairment at baseline, presence of crescents, and a higher chronicity index at baseline were also corroborated in our study. [8],[28],[29],[30],[31]

The reported rates of relapse vary from 25% at 5 years, to 46% at 10 years. [32],[33] The duration of follow-up was too short to provide meaningful rates of relapse, but two patients had relapsed in the 1 st and 2 nd years. 14% of the patients experienced treatment failure after the first 6 months. This is similar to the rate of treatment failure in the Euro Lupus trial (16% in the low-dose cyclophosphamide arm; 20% in the high-dose arm). [20]

A study from south India revealed that remission rates in a cohort of predominantly Class IV lupus patients were 82.05% and average time to remission was 15 months. In this study, early diagnosis, a higher creatinine at presentation, and ACEi/ARB use predicted remission. [34] Another study by the same authors highlighted that cyclophosphamide therapy in a group of 39 patients (75% Class IV) achieved complete remission in 44.8% of patients after a mean follow-up of 15.8 months. [35] In another study which looked at long-term survival in lupus nephritis, risk factors for poor outcome were low C3, hematuria, hypertension, creatinine, lack of remission, and occurrence of a major infection. [36] Another report highlighted that pediatric lupus had slightly better outcomes - 84.6% were in complete or partial remission at 1 year. [37] In the pediatric population, a study from eastern India revealed that overall female to male ratio was 3.8:1. Renal manifestations were present in 54% of the patients. [38] Another report from north India evaluated 25 children with lupus nephritis. Cyclophosphamide pulses were given in eight patients, four of whom became asymptomatic after 4-24 months of therapy. [39] Diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis (WHO class IV) is the predominant histological presentation in children and is more common in boys than girls. [40] In the adult patients, men had more severe renal impairment (60% vs. 37.5%), with higher levels of mean serum creatinine (2.67 vs. 1.62 mg/dl), and blood urea (63.25 vs. 48 mg/dL) compared to women. [41] The phenotypic expression of renal disease is severe in Indians. A study on serum levels of interferon-gamma (IFN-g), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-4 (IL-4), and interlekin-10 (IL-10) were carried out in Indian patients. TNF-α and IFN-g were positively correlated and IL-10 and IL-4 were negatively correlated with SLEDAI scores. The authors concluded that TNF-α contributed significantly to pathological manifestations of SLE in this region. [42]

In the present study, we evaluated a population of patients with SLE class IV nephritis. We assessed response to therapy and its predictors in the short term. At baseline, age proved to be negatively correlated to outcomes. Age at diagnosis, the chronicity index, and the eGFR at baseline provided 52% of the variance to predict the eGFR at 6 months. Other factors for poor prognosis were hypertension, proteinuria, eGFR at baseline, percentage of glomeruli in the biopsy specimen containing crescents, and activity and chronicity indices.

 
  References Top

1.Pollak VE, Pirani Cl, Schwartz FD. The natural history of the renal manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Lab Clin Med 1964;63:537-50.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Cameron JS. Lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999;10:413-24.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Ward MM, Pyun E, Studenski S. Long-term survival in systemic lupus erythematosus. Patient characteristics associated with poorer outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:274-83.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Contreras G, Lenz O, Pardo V, Borja E, Cely C, Iqbal K, et al. Outcomes in African Americans and Hispanics with lupus nephritis. Kidney Int 2006;69:1846-51.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Seligman VA, Lum RF, Olson JL, Li H, Criswell LA. Demographic differences in the development of lupus nephritis: A retrospective analysis. Am J Med 2002;112:726-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Chan TM, Tse KC, Tang CS, Lai KN, Li FK. Long-term outcome of patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis treated with prednisolone and oral cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine. Lupus 2005;14:265-72.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Rabbani MA, Habib HB, Islam M, Ahmad B, Majid S, Saeed W, et al. Survival analysis and prognostic indicators of systemic lupus erythematosus in Pakistani patients. Lupus 2009;18:848-55.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Austin HA 3 rd , Boumpas DT, Vaughan EM, Balow JE. High-risk features of lupus nephritis: Importance of race and clinical and histological factors in 166 patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995;10:1620-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Berden JH. Lupus nephritis. Kidney Int 1997;52:538-58.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Korbet SM, Lewis EJ, Schwartz MM, Reichlin M, Evans J, Rohde RD. Factors predictive of outcome in severe lupus nephritis. Lupus nephritis collaborative study group. Am J Kidney Dis 2000;35:904-14.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.Alarcón GS, McGwin G Jr, Petri M, Reveille JD, Ramsey-Goldman R, Kimberly RP, et al. Baseline characteristics of a multiethnic lupus cohort: Profile. Lupus 2002;11:95-101.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Ioannidis JP, Boki KA, Katsorida ME, Drosos AA, Skopouli FN, Boletis JN, et al. Remission, relapse, and re-remission of proliferative lupus nephritis treated with cyclophosphamide. Kidney Int 2000;57:258-64.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1725.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Weening JJ, D'Agati VD, Schwartz MM, Seshan SV, Alpers CE, Appel GB, et al. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004;15:241-50.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Gordon C, Jayne D, Pusey C, Adu D, Amoura Z, Aringer M, et al. European consensus statement on the terminology used in the management of lupus glomerulonephritis. Lupus 2009;18:257-63.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Chan TM, Li FK, Tang CS, Wong RW, Fang GX, Ji YL, et al. Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. Hong Kong Guangzhou Nephrology Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000;343;1156-62.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Schwartz GJ, Work DF. Measurement and estimation of GFR in children and adolescents. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;4:1832-43.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Liang, MH, Schur, PH, Fortin, P, et al. The American college of rheumatology response criteria for proliferative and membranous renal disease in systemic lupus erythematosus clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:421-32.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Boumpas DT, Balow JE. Outcome criteria for lupus nephritis trials: A critical overview. Lupus 1998;7:622-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Houssiau FA, Vasconcelos C, D'Cruz D, Sebastiani GD, Garrido Ed Ede R, Danieli MG, et al. Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis: The euro-lupus nephritis trial, a randomized trial of low-dose versus high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:2121-31  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Isenberg D, Appel GB, Contreras G, Dooley MA, Ginzler EM, Jayne D, et al. Influence of race/ethnicity on response to lupus nephritis treatment: The ALMS study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010;49:128-40.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Appel GB, Contreras G, Dooley MA, Ginzler EM, Isenberg D, Jayne D, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide for induction treatment of lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;20:1103-12.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Ginzler EM, Wofsy D, Isenberg D, Gordon C, Lisk L, Dooley MA, et al. Nonrenal disease activity following mycophenolate mofetil or intravenous cyclophosphamide as induction treatment for lupus nephritis: Findings in a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:211-21.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Mok CC, Ying KY, Tang S, Leung CY, Lee KW, Ng WL, et al. Predictors and outcome of renal flares after successful cyclophosphamide treatment for diffuse proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:2559-68.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Moroni G, Quaglini S, Gallelli B, Banfi G, Messa P, Ponticelli C. The long-term outcome of 93 patients with proliferative lupus nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007;22:2531-9.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Gourley MF, Austin HA 3 rd , Scott D, Yarboro CH, Vaughan EM, Muir J, et al. Methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide, alone or in combination, in patients with lupus nephritis. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:549-57.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Houssiau FA, Vasconcelos C, D'Cruz D, Sebastiani GD, de Ramon Garrido E, Danieli MG, et al. Early response to immunosuppressive therapy predicts good renal outcome in lupus nephritis: lessons from long-term follow up of patients in the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:3934-40.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Esdaile JM, Levinton C, Federgreen W, Hayslett JP, Kashgarian M. The clinical and renal biopsy predictors of long-term outcome in lupus nephritis: A study of 87 patients and review of the literature. Q J Med 1989;72:779-833.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Lupus nephritis: prognostic factors and probability of maintaining life-supporting renal function 10 years after the diagnosis. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Nefrite Lupica (GISNEL). Am J Kidney Dis. 1992;19:473-9.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Austin HA 3 rd , Boumpas DT, Vaughan EM, Balow JE. Predicting renal outcomes in severe lupus nephritis: Contributions of clinical and histologic data. Kidney Int 1994;45:544-50.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Lim CS, Chin HJ, Jung YC, Kim YS, Ahn C, Han JS, et al. Prognostic factors of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. Clin Nephrol 1999;52:139-47.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Moroni G, Quaglini S, Maccario M, Banfi G, Ponticelli C. "Nephritic flares" are predictors of bad long-term renal outcome in lupus nephritis. Kidney Int 1996;50:2047-53.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Ciruelo E, de la Cruz J, López I, Gómez-Reino JJ. Cumulative rate of relapse of lupus nephritis after successful treatment with cyclophosphamide. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39:2028-34.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Annavarajula SK, Murty KV, Prayaga A, Das U, Desai M, Narain CA. The outcome of proliferative lupus nephritis with pulse cyclophosphamide therapy. Indian J Nephrol 2011;21:160-5.  Back to cited text no. 34
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
35.Das U, Dakshina Murty KV, Prasad N, Prayag A. Pulse cyclophospamide in severe lupus nephritis: Southern Indian experience. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2010;21:372-8.  Back to cited text no. 35
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
36.Dhir V, Aggarwal A, Lawrence A, Agarwal V, Misra R. Long-term outcome of lupus nephritis in Asian Indians. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:713-20.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.Hari P, Bagga A, Mahajan P, Dinda A. Outcome of lupus nephritis in Indian children. Lupus 2009;18:348-54.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.Mondal R, Nandi M, Ganguli S, Ghosh A, Hazra A. Childhood lupus: Experience from Eastern India. Indian J Pediatr 2010;77:889-91.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.Singh S, Devidayal, Minz R, Nada R, Joshi K. Childhood lupus nephritis: 12 years experience from North India. Rheumatol Int 2006;26:604-7.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.Gupta KL. Lupus nephritis in children. Indian J Pediatr 1999;66:215-23.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.Soni SS, Gowrishankar S, Adikey GK, Raman A. Sex-based differences in lupus nephritis: A study of 235 Indian patients. J Nephrol 2008;21:570-5.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.Arora V, Verma J, Marwah V, Kumar A, Anand D, Das N. Cytokine imbalance in systemic lupus erythematosus: A study on northern Indian subjects. Lupus 2012;21:596-603.  Back to cited text no. 42
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

Indian Journal of Nephrology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 20th Sept '07