Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Letters to Editor
29 (
1
); 70-71
doi:
10.4103/ijn.IJN_8_18

Early Recurrent Primary Membranous Nephropathy Detected in an Allograft Biopsy

Department of Histopathology, Aster CMI Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Department of Histopathology, Apollo Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Address for correspondence: Dr. T. Kaur, Department of Histopathology, Aster CMI Hospital, Sahakara Nagar, Hebbal, Bangalore - 560 092, Karnataka, India. E-mail: tripti31886@gmail.com
Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Recurrent primary membranous nephropathy (MN) is known to occur in renal allografts in about 40% cases, leading to graft dysfunction.[1] Recurrence is most common 2–3 years post–renal transplant but can occur as early as 1 week.[2] Protocol biopsies can reveal the recurrence before proteinuria develops.[1] In early cases, light microscopy (LM, including periodic acid–Schiff or silver stains) will not demonstrate diagnostic abnormalities; however, deposits can be detected by immunofluorescence (IF). Rodriguez EF et al. added Stage 0 in electron microscopic (EM) staging system, where deposits are seen only in IF.[3]

We report a case of recurrent MN 8 days posttransplant, with emphasis on the ancillary findings, which helped in arriving at a conclusive diagnosis. A 19-year-old male presented with nephrotic syndrome, with the three biopsies in 2010, 2013 and 2015, reported as MN, with progression to end-stage renal disease in June 2015. PLA2R antibody titers were >1500 RU/ml (6 months before RT). He underwent a live-related RT, with mother as donor, in January 2016. An unexplained rise in serum creatinine was seen on the 8th postoperative day, due to which a renal biopsy was done.

Renal biopsy showed essentially unremarkable glomeruli with evidence of acute T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), Type 1A. IF study showed fine granular deposits of IgG along the glomerular basement membrane (GBM). C4d immune stain findings showed strong granular staining along the GBM, being negative in the peritubular capillaries. Immunohistochemistry for PLA2R was done which revealed a fine granular positivity along the GBM. In view of IF deposits and C4d and PLA2R positivity along the GBM, a concurrent recurrent MN is present [Figure 1a-d]. On EM study, electron-dense deposits were not seen, suggesting it to be a Stage 0 MN.

Figure 1
(a) Unremarkable glomeruli, with tubulointerstitial lymphomononuclear cell infiltrate, with foci of moderate tubulitis (inset), consistent with acute T-cell-mediated rejection, Type IA (PAS, ×400). (b) C4d immunohistochemistry reveals granular deposits along the glomerular basement membrane and negative in peritubular capillaries (C4d IHC, ×400). (c) Immunofluorescence study showed fine granular deposits of IgG along the glomerular basement membrane (×400). (d) Immunohistochemistry for PLA2R showed fine granular staining along the glomerular basement membrane (PLA2R, ×400)

PLA2R antibody titer postbiopsy was 320 RU/ml (cutoff 20 RU/ml). On follow-up, progressive rise in proteinuria was seen, which reached a peak of 5400 mg/24 h in June 2016, after which rituximab was initiated. PLA2R levels were 760 RU/ml, before the initiation of rituximab. Thereafter, there was gradual fall in PLA2R titers, following which proteinuria also came down [Figure 2].

Figure 2
Chart showing the pattern of PLA2R and proteinuria before and after initiation of rituximab, pre- and post-transplant (T-time of renal transplantation)

In this case, we describe the earliest features of recurrent membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) in the allograft observed within the first 8 days, posttransplant period. MGN is characterized morphologically by subepithelial immune complex deposits, which in native kidneys are seen by IF and EM, and by LM in more advanced cases, with thickening of and “spikes” along the glomerular capillary wall. The MGN disease stages based on EM appearance consists of Stage I–IV. In this case, we observe IF evidence of immune complex deposition before these deposits are visualized by EM, and so, these cases represent “Stage 0” MGN or MGN by IF only. The same was demonstrated by Rodriguez et al.[3] in their study on 21 cases of recurrent MGN posttransplant, with a mean biopsy period of 2.7 months posttransplant. Therefore, this case represents the earliest manifestation that one could find after transplant, in recurrent MGN. It was rising creatinine, due to ongoing TCMR which required urgent attention, due to which biopsy was performed.

Furthermore, monitoring PLA2R serological levels is a useful methodology to monitor the recurrence and remission of MGN in such cases. Pattern of positivity in PLA2R stain, i.e., fine granular stain along the GBM, is also a useful clue to complement the diagnosis and confirm it as primary MGN.

To conclude, MN can recur as early as 1 week posttransplant. Recognition of the fine granular staining pattern of C4d, the IF pattern, and the pattern of PLA2R stain positivity is important in arriving at a conclusive diagnosis, as the glomeruli can be normal on LM and significant proteinuria may be absent. The serum anti-PLA2R antibody titers are predictive of recurrence.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. , , , , , . Recurrent idiopathic membranous nephropathy after kidney transplantation: A surveillance biopsy study. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:1318-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Membranous glomerulonephritis. In: , , , , eds. Heptinstall's Pathology of the Kidney (7th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; . p. :255-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . The pathology and clinical features of early recurrent membranous glomerulonephritis. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:1029-38.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections