Advertisment
Indian Journal of Nephrology About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Current Issue | Archives| Ahead of print | Search |Instructions |  Editorial Board  

Users Online:736

Official publication of the Indian Society of Nephrology

Ahead of print articles
CASE REPORT
Ahead of print publication  

Novel variation in CFB adult onset atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: A case report and review


 Department of Nephrology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

Date of Submission31-Jul-2019
Date of Acceptance31-Oct-2019
Date of Web Publication28-Mar-2020

Correspondence Address:
Malsawmkima Chhakchhuak,
Department of Nephrology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Industrial Area, 2nd Phase, Basni, Jodhpur - 342 005, Rajasthan
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_265_19

  Abstract 


We report a case of 47-year-old male with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). He had low C3 levels and whole exome sequencing revealed heterozygous missense novel variation in exon 8 of the gene encoding complement factor B (CFB), leading to substitution of leucine for proline at codon 369 (c.1106C>T; p.Pro369Leu). Following plasma exchanges and hemodialysis, the patient achieved hematological remission and became dialysis independent.

Keywords: Acute kidney injury, atypical HUS, CFB gene, complement factor B, plasma exchange



How to cite this URL:
Chhakchhuak M, Agarwal J. Novel variation in CFB adult onset atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: A case report and review. Indian J Nephrol [Epub ahead of print] [cited 2020 May 25]. Available from: http://www.indianjnephrol.org/preprintarticle.asp?id=281579




  Introduction Top


Approximately, 10% of all hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is atypical, caused by neither shigatoxin-producing bacteria nor streptococci. Atypical HUS (aHUS) is usually associated with perturbations in alternate complement cascade and has poor prognosis, with mortality as high as 25% and progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in 50% cases.[1] Complement factor B (CFB) is an essential component for activation of alternate complement pathway. Its active subunit combines with C3b to form C3 convertase (C3bBb), the chief driver of the activation of complement cascade. Gain of function mutations in CFB is described to cause chronic alternative complement pathway activation and is a rare cause of aHUS, implicated in only 1–2% of all cases of aHUS.[2]


  Case Report Top


A 47-year-old male without previous comorbidities presented with complain of pedal edema, facial puffiness, and decreased urine output for 2 days. On examination, he had pallor, pedal edema, and blood pressure of 168/94 mm Hg. Rest of the physical examination was within normal limits. Laboratory parameters revealed hemoglobin 8.5 g/dl, total leukocyte count 11500/μL, platelet count 83000/μL, serum creatinine 7.4 mg/dl, serum lactate dehydrogenase 1565 U/L, peripheral blood film showing schistocytes, slightly raised total, and indirect bilirubin, normal kidney sizes on ultrasonography, no active urinary sediments, complement C3 level 46 mg/dl (normal level 90–180 mg/dl) and negative ANA; there was no evidence of G6PD deficiency. The patient received seven sessions of plasma exchanges along with three sessions of hemodialysis, following which he achieved hematological remission and became dialysis independent. Renal biopsy was done which revealed evidence of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Antibodies to complement factor H were not sent for. Whole exome sequencing revealed novel heterozygous variation in exon 8 of the gene encoding complement factor B (CFB), at c.1106C>T (p. Pro369Leu) that was classified as variant of uncertain significance using the 2015 criteria of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The disease relapsed once 1 month after hematological remission, with platelet count dropping to 75000/μL and mildly elevated LDH (437 U/L). The relapse responded promptly to plasma infusions, administered at 20 ml/kg/day for 3 days, with platelet count and LDH returning to normal. However, C3 level remained low (52 mg/dl) and serum creatinine was 3.5 mg/dl on last follow-up.


  Discussion Top


Hemolytic uremic syndrome is characterized by a triad of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury. Shigatoxin (Stx)-producing  Escherichia More Details coli O157:H7 is the most common type of HUS. HUS not caused by Stx is termed as atypical HUS and is primarily caused by complement dysregulation. Besides these, HUS might also be secondary to other infections, metabolic condition, drugs, pregnancy, autoimmune disease, or following transplantation.[1],[3] Atypical HUS represents approximately 5–10% of all HUS in children and majority of cases in adult. aHUS is an uncommon disease, affecting two per million population. Almost 20% of cases of aHUS are familial.[4]

Deficiencies in the alternative complement pathway proteins include inactivating mutations of genes coding regulators of the alternative complement pathway, such as complement factor I (CFI), factor H (CFH), membrane cofactor protein (MCP), and thrombomodulin (THBD); gain of function mutations in genes encoding factor B (CFB) and C3 (C3), and, chiefly in children, antibodies to CFH associated with homozygous CFHR1 deletion. Additionally, single nucleotide polymorphisms or haplotypes in CFHR1, CFH, and MCP increase susceptibility to aHUS.[5] Mutations in CFH are most common (20–30% of aHUS), followed by MCP (10-15%), C3 ( 5-10%), CFI (4-10%), and THBD (5%); of these., gain-of-function mutations in CFB are the rarest, seen only in 1 to 2% of patients with aHUS.[2] [Table 1] summarizes the handful of cases with CFB mutation reported worldwide. The first such report was of two mutations from the Spanish aHUS cohort in 2007.[2]
Table 1: Comparision of CFB gene mutation of various cohorts and case reports

Click here to view


Outcomes of aHUS vary depending upon the underlying complement factor deficiency. Around 60–70% of aHUS patients with CFI, CFH, and C3 mutations, and 30% of those with anti-CFH autoantibodies die during the acute episode or go into end-stage kidney disease after relapses. Mutations in CFB are commonly associated with adverse renal outcomes, with loss of renal function in 88% of patients.[2]

Eculizumab is considered as the first-line therapy for all forms of primary aHUS, since this treatment improves renal function when started early during presentation with aHUS.[13] The duration of treatment remains unclear; whereas there is no evidence to support lifelong therapy in all types of aHUS, relapses occur after therapy discontinuation in 60-70% patients with CFH mutations, 50% with MCP mutations and 43% in C3 mutations.[14] Hence, long-term therapy is recommended. In our case, eculizumab was indicated but could not be started due to unavailability. Plasma therapy in the form of plasma exchange or plasma infusion may be the only therapy available, especially in developing countries such as in our case. The therapy should be started as soon as aHUS is suspected, ideally within 24 hours of presentation, and continued until normalization of platelet count and serum LDH. Plasma exchange is gradually tapered and withdrawn after achieving remission. Although there is limited evidence to establish the superiority of plasma exchange over plasma infusion, most experts recommend exchanges in view of the volume of plasma replaced. Overall, the choice is based on available resources, local expertise, and individual tolerance.[15] During plasma exchange, 1–2 plasma volumes (40–80 mL/kg per in adults and 50–100 mL/kg in children) are replaced in each session, with exchange frequency and duration decided based on the clinical response. Plasma infusions are an option when eculizumab or plasma exchange are not available and are administered initially at 30–40 mL/kg, followed by 10–20 mL/kg/day. Plasma infusion are also used to prevent or treat recurrence of aHUS when eculizumab is not accessible, as in our patient, and should be continued until normalization of platelet count and serum LDH.[16] Recently published HUS guidelines on managing aHUS in developing countries recommended long-term plasma infusion and consideration of eculizumab in patients with aHUS with mutations in CFB, CFI, C3, CFH, or THBD.[17]

Data are limited on response to plasma therapy in patients with CFB mutations. Remission following plasma therapy was reported in five cases[2],[7],[8],[10] and in 30% patients with CFB mutation in another series.[1] In our patient, seven sessions of plasma exchanges led to hematological remission and discontinuation of dialysis, although renal function remained deranged. Family screening was offered after genetic counseling but could not be conducted due to financial constraints. The novel variation in CFB in our index patient while classified as variation of unknown significance using standard criteria, is uncommon, reported in 0.1%, and 0.05% cases in the 1000 Genome Project and Exome Aggregation Consortium databases, respectively. Its functional significance as a gain-in-function variation requires testing in animal andin vitro models.


  Conclusion Top


We describe, in an adult patient with aHUS, a novel heterozygous variation in CFB in exon 8 leading to amino acid substitution of leucine for proline at codon 369 (c.1106C>T; p. Pro369Leu). The functional significance and pathogenicity of the reported change requires confirmation inin vitro and animal models and/or reporting in more patients with aHUS.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Noris M, Remuzzi G. Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1676-87.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Goicoechea de Jorge E, Harris CL, Esparza-Gordillo J, Carreras L, Arranz EA, Garrido CA, et al. Gain-of-function mutations in complement factor B are associated with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:240-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kavanagh D, Goodship TH, Richards A. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Semin Nephrol 2013;33:508-30.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Loirat C, Frémeaux-Bacchi V. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2011;6:60.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Fakhouri F, Garnier A, Bienaimé F, Dragon-Durey MA, Ngo S, et al. Genetics and outcome of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: A nationwide French series comparing children and adults. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;8:554-62.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Maga TK, Nishimura CJ, Weaver AE, Frees KL, Smith RJ. Mutations in alternative pathway complement proteins in American patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Hum Mutat 2010;31:1445-60.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Tawadrous H, Maga T, Sharma J, Kupferman J, Smith RJ, Schoeneman M. A novel mutation in the complement factor B gene (CFB) and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol 2010;25:947-51.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Funato M, Uemura O, Ushijima K, Ohnishi H, Orii K, Kato Z, et al. A complement factor B mutation in a large kindred with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. J Clin Immunol 2014;34:691-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Geerdink LM, Westra D, van Wijk JA, Dorresteijn EM, Lilien MR, Davin JC, et al. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in children: Complement mutations and clinical characteristics. Pediatr Nephrol 2012;27:1283-91.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Roumenina LT, Jablonski M, Hue C, Blouin J, Dimitrov JD, Dragon-Durey MA, et al. Hyperfunctional C3 convertase leads to complement deposition on endothelial cells and contributes to atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Blood 2009;114:2837-45.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Alfakeeh K, Mohammed Azar M, Alfadhel M, Abdullah AM, Aloudah N, Alsaad KO. Rare genetic variant in the CFB gene presenting as atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and immune complex diffuse membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, with crescents, successfully treated with Eculizumab. Pediatr Nephrol 2017;32:885-91.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Zhang T, Lu J, Liang S, Chen D, Zhang H, Zeng C, et al. Comprehensive analysis of complement genes in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Am J Nephrol 2016;43:160-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Fakhouri F, Hourmant M, Campistol JM, Cataland SR, Espinosa M, Gaber AO, et al. Terminal complement inhibitor eculizumab in adult patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: A single-arm, open-label trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2016;68:84-93.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Fakhouri F, Loirat C. Anticomplement treatment in atypical and typical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Semin Hematol 2018;55:150-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Nester CM, Barbour T, de Cordoba SR, Dragon-Durey MA, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Goodship TH, et al. Atypical aHUS: State of the art. Mol Immunol 2015;67:31-42.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Noris M, Bresin E, Mele C, Remuzzi G. Genetic Atypical Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome. 2007 Nov 16 [Updated 2016 Jun 9]. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2019.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Bagga A, Khandelwal P, Mishra K, Thergaonkar R, Vasudevan A, Sharma J, et al. Hemolytic uremic syndrome in a developing country: Consensus guidelines. Pediatr Nephrol 2019;34:1465-82.  Back to cited text no. 17
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

 
Top
 
 
  Search
 
  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Case Report
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed263    
    PDF Downloaded16    

Recommend this journal

Indian Journal of Nephrology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 20th Sept '07