Indian Journal of Nephrology Home 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
[View FULLTEXT] [Download PDF]
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 29  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 317--323

Effect of isothermic dialysis on intradialytic hypertension

I Veerappan1, G Thiruvenkadam2, G Abraham3, BR Dasari4, A Rajagopal5 
1 Department of Nephrology, KG Hospital and Postgraduate Institute, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of General Medicine, Kavery Hospital, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Department of Nephrology, Madras Medical Mission, Chennai; Department of Nephrology and General Medicine, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, India
4 Department of Physiology, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, India
5 Department of Statistics, Indian Statistical Institute, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
I Veerappan
KG Hospital and Postgraduate Institute, No-4 Govt. Arts College Road, Gopalapuram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
India

The primary outcome was incidence of intradialytic hypertension (IDH) during standard and cooler isothermic dialysate temperatures. Two pair of haemodialysis sessions were done at 37°C (SHD) and at isothermic temperature (IHD). All the four dialysis were done on the same time of the day to negate the changes due to circadian variation in body temperature. Axillary and tympanic temperatures were measured before start of the dialysis and dialysis temperature was adjusted as per axillary temperature. Sixty patients were enrolled and completed the study. The mean delivered dialysate temperature in the intervention group was 36.5 ± 0.2 achieving a 0.5 ± 0.2°C between-group separation. The incidence of IDH and intradialytic hypotension while on SHD and IHD were 79/120 (66%) vs 44/120 (37%), odds ratio (OR) 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.96–5.65) and 45/120 (38%) vs 14/120 (12%), OR 4.5, 95% CI (2.3–8.7), respectively. The 4 h time averaged mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) at IHD and SHD were 154 ± 1.7 and 157.2 ± 1.1 mmHg, respectively, the mean difference in SBP being −3.4 mmHg to −3.1 mmHg, 95% CI, P < 0.001. The standard deviation, a measure of BP variability was lower at IHD than at SHD (P < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis during IHD there was a significant reduction of both SBP and diastolic BP during the entire duration of dialysis in 35 out of 60 patients (systolic 4 h mean 154.96 ± 2.22 vs 164.32 ± 1.99 mmHg), (diastolic 4 h mean 79.24 ± 0.82 vs 82.54 ± 0.68 mmHg) – (rANOVA for systolic and diastolic <0.001). This phenomenon of cooler dialysis causing reduction of BP was reproduced in the same group of patients when the IHD was repeated another time (systolic 4 h mean 157.95 ± 1.88 vs 160.65 ± 1.47), (diastolic 4 h mean 79.27 ± 0.74 vs 82.03 ± 1.07) rANOVA for systolic and diastolic <0.001. The incidence of IDH can be reduced significantly by reducing the dialysate temperature to patients' body temperature. Hypertension during dialysis is related to heat gain during dialysis.

How to cite this article:
Veerappan I, Thiruvenkadam G, Abraham G, Dasari B R, Rajagopal A. Effect of isothermic dialysis on intradialytic hypertension.Indian J Nephrol 2019;29:317-323

How to cite this URL:
Veerappan I, Thiruvenkadam G, Abraham G, Dasari B R, Rajagopal A. Effect of isothermic dialysis on intradialytic hypertension. Indian J Nephrol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 15 ];29:317-323
Available from: http://www.indianjnephrol.org/article.asp?issn=0971-4065;year=2019;volume=29;issue=5;spage=317;epage=323;aulast=Veerappan;type=0