Advertisment

Indian Journal of Nephrology About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Current Issue | Archives| Ahead of print | Search |Instructions |  Editorial Board  

Users Online:113

Official publication of the Indian Society of Nephrology
  Search
 
  
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~Related articles
 ~  Article in PDF (523 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Methods
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3278    
    Printed77    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded218    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal

 


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 372-376
 

Risk factors for urinary tract infections in renal allograft recipients: Experience of a tertiary care center in Hyderabad, South India


1 Department of Microbiology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
2 Department of Nephrology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Date of Web Publication31-Aug-2017

Correspondence Address:
V Lakshmi
Department of Microbiology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad - 500 082, Telangana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_331_16

Rights and Permissions

  Abstract 


Renal transplantation is an effective and commonly performed procedure for end-stage renal disease. Urinary tract infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant patients. As data on postrenal transplant urinary tract infections from the Indian subcontinent are limited, the present study was conducted to estimate the burden of urinary tract infections in this vulnerable group of patients. This was a prospective study on patients undergoing renal transplantation in 2014 at our tertiary hospital in South India with a follow-up of 2 years to evaluate the risk factors for urinary tract infections. The prevalence of urinary tract infections was 41.9% with a male preponderance of 76.9%. Mean age of the 31 patients was 32.4 ± 10.2 years (range: 16–55 years). Gram-negative bacilli were the most common isolates with Escherichia coli being the predominant pathogen (53.3%). All the infections occurred within 1 year of transplantation with delayed graft function (P < 0.001; confidence interval [CI]: 29.0–96.3) and prolonged hospital stay (P = 0.0281; CI: 42.1–99.6) being the significant risk factors for acquiring urinary tract infections. Carbapenemase production was noted in 33.3% of isolates and all the Gram-negative organisms isolated in the 1st month of transplantation were carbapenem-resistant (CR) E. coli. The high rate of carbapenem-resistant organisms in the early posttransplant period is a point of concern, especially with cadaver transplants. Infection control practices and catheter care need to be strictly monitored to minimize the risk for UTI in the immediate posttransplant period.


Keywords: Renal transplantation, risk factors, urinary tract infections


How to cite this article:
Mohan M, Neeraja M, Sudhaharan S, Raju S B, Gangadhar T, Lakshmi V. Risk factors for urinary tract infections in renal allograft recipients: Experience of a tertiary care center in Hyderabad, South India. Indian J Nephrol 2017;27:372-6

How to cite this URL:
Mohan M, Neeraja M, Sudhaharan S, Raju S B, Gangadhar T, Lakshmi V. Risk factors for urinary tract infections in renal allograft recipients: Experience of a tertiary care center in Hyderabad, South India. Indian J Nephrol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2022 Aug 10];27:372-6. Available from: https://www.indianjnephrol.org/text.asp?2017/27/5/372/212892





  Introduction Top


Renal transplantation is an effective and commonly performed procedure for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, infections are a major cause for morbidity and mortality in the kidney transplant recipient. The risk of infection is influenced by net state of immunosuppression. Time to regain renal function, rejection episodes, and source of the donor kidney are other important factors.

The infection may be nosocomial or arise de novo in the recipient, reactivated latent infection or graft contamination. Among all, urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common and accounts for 40%–50% of all infectious complications in renal transplant recipients.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5] Around 20% of the untreated UTIs end up in pyelonephritis, carrying a subsequent risk of life-threatening urosepsis and graft loss.[6],[7] Hence, early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of UTI are critical in renal transplant recipient. The present study seeks to determine the current burden and the various risk factors contributing to UTIs in this vulnerable group of renal transplant patients at a tertiary referral center in Southern India.


  Methods Top


This was a prospective study on 31 patients who underwent renal transplantation in the year 2014 at Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences. All the patients were clinically followed for the next 2 years in the Transplant Outpatient Clinic, thrice weekly for first 3 months, twice weekly for the next 3 months, once a month from 6th month to 1 year, and once in 3 months thereafter. Essentially, the study period was between January 2014 and December 2015. All the patients were on triple immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. Cadaver transplant patients received an additional induction regimen with basiliximab on postoperative day 0 and day 4. Foley catheter was removed on the 4th postoperative day, and for patients on doubleJ stent, it was removed after 1 month.

Urine samples from patients with symptoms of fever, dysuria, urgency/frequency, and flank pain or suprapubic tenderness were sent to the Microbiology Laboratory for culture and sensitivity. Samples were inoculated on CHROMagar plates (CPS ID, bioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile-France) and incubated overnight at 37°C. Pure growth of ≤2 organisms with a colony count ≥10,000 CFU/ml was processed further. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing of the bacterial isolates were performed by Automated Vitek 2 system (bioMerieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France).

Recurrent UTI was defined as the occurrence of at least three episodes of symptomatic UTI in a 12-month period or two consecutive episodes within 6 months. Recurrent infection with the same microorganism was considered as a relapse. Reinfection is infection with a different microorganism, same microorganism in more than 1 month after treatment, or a sterile intervening culture.[8]

The statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the risk factors for UTI and the incidence of early infections using Fisher's exact test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


  Results Top


Live donor transplants were performed in twenty patients and cadaver transplants in 11 patients. The median follow-up was 538 days (366–716). The mean age of the allograft recipients was 32.4 ± 10.2 years (range: 16–55 years), and 23 patients were male. Hypertension was documented in 30/31 (96.7%) patients. In all, 13/31 (41.9%) patients had UTI (10/23 [43.5%] males and 3/8 [37.5%] females). A single episode of UTI was recorded in 7/13 (53.8%) patients, while repeated episodes were documented in 6/13 (46.2%) patients. Of the latter, 4/6 (66.7%) patients were male with six episodes, and 2/6 (33.3%) were female with two episodes among them.

Recurrent UTI was observed in 4/13 patients; one patient had recurrent UTI with carbapenem-resistant (CR) Escherichia coli infection in the first 3 months followed by a recurrence in the 11th month, 2 patients had recurrent UTI with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) E. coli in the 5th, 6th and 11th, 12th months, respectively, while the other patient had recurrent UTI with ESBL Klebsiella pneumoniae in the 2nd and 5th months [Table 1]. Three patients with recurrent UTI were transplanted with cadaver kidneys, and 2/4 (50%) had delayed graft function.
Table 1: Distribution of isolates in patients with urinary tract infection

Click here to view


Reinfection followed by a relapse was observed in two patients; both were males, transplanted with cadaver kidneys and had delayed graft function.

All the UTI episodes occurred within 1 year of transplantation with the majority of them occurring in the first 3 months (09/15; 60%) [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Timeline of recurrent urinary tract infections in renal transplant patients

Click here to view


Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) were the most common isolates (14/15; 93.3%). ESBL production was documented in 7/15 isolates (46.6%) and carbapenem resistance in 5/15 isolates (33.3%).

E. coli was the predominant pathogen in 8/15 (53.3%) patients, of which 5/8 (62.5%) were CR and all the CR E. coli were isolated in the 1st month of transplantation (P = 0.0020; 95% CI: 1.0 [47.8–1.0]). Recurrences were recorded more in patients presenting with E. coli UTI (4/6; 66.6%).

Infections in the immediate post transplant period adversely affect graft survival, an attempt to document the likely risk factors for UTI in the first 3 months was made. Patients with UTI in the first 3 months were placed in Group I (seven patients) while rest of the 24 patients were placed in Group II [Table 2]. Delayed graft function (P < 0.001) and prolonged hospital stay (P = 0.0281) emerged as significant risk factors for UTI in the first 3 months. However, female gender and prolonged duration of dialysis before transplantation did not increase the risk of UTI. Biopsy-proven rejection was documented among all the three patients with recurrent UTI within the first 3 months.
Table 2: Risk factors for urinary tract infection in first 3 months

Click here to view


All the patients with delayed graft function (6/6; 100%) were transplanted with cadaver kidneys, with an increased risk of UTI in the first 3 months - 5/13 (71.4%). Rejection episodes were observed in 8/13 (61.5%) patients with UTI (P = 0.0209; 95% CI: 61.5 [31.5–86.1]).

Mortality rate was 4/31 (12.9%); 2 patients had a UTI, and 3 had a biopsy-proven rejection episode. Graft pyelonephritis secondary to UTI with CR E. coli was observed in one patient in the study group.


  Discussion Top


Renal transplantation is a valuable modality of treatment for patients with ESRD. Infections remain a major setback despite significant advances in the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive drugs. UTI is the most common infection after renal transplantation and is likely to interfere with the graft function if not adequately treated.[9] Bacteria are the most common cause of postrenal transplant UTIs; fungi and viruses are less common;[10],[11] Gram-negative organisms were the predominant pathogens in the early posttransplant period.[12],[13],[14],[15],[16]

The incidence of UTI in the present study was 41.9% and within the rates (35%–79%) reported from other centers.[1],[12],[17] An earlier study from our institute reported a rate of 23.6%[2] while another Indian study documented a rate of 53%.[4] All the 15 UTI episodes occurred within one year of transplantation, as was seen in other studies[18],[19],[20] and 60% of these (9/15) occurred within the first 3 months.

Documented risk factors for UTI in renal transplant patients across the world are female sex,[12],[13],[17],[21],[22] old age,[15],[16] acute rejection,[23] cadaver donor kidney,[1],[24] and prolonged hospital stay.[25],[26]

In the present study, delayed graft function was seen only in cadaver transplants and was a significant risk factor (P < 0.001) for UTI as was hospital stay of more than 10 days (P = 0.0281); similar observations were made in other studies.[25],[26],[27],[28] Patients with rejection episodes (8/13) were more likely to have UTI (P = 0.0209; 95% CI: 61.5 [31.5–86.1]), which was similar to the observation made by Golebiewska et al., 2014. This could be due to the increased immunosuppression given to these patients predisposing to infection.

The most common organism causing UTI was E. coli (53.3%, 8/15) as in other studies.[12],[14],[15] Recurrences were more common in patients presenting with E. coli UTI (4/6;66.6%) probably due to the persistence of uropathogenic E. coli by the formation of intracellular bacterial communities, which later enter a dormant state within host epithelial cells.[29] The intracellular localization of these bacteria renders them resistant to most antibiotics and inaccessible to infiltrating neutrophils and other host defenses. The resurgence of the organisms from these reservoirs can initiate recrudescent infections.

The incidence of recurrent UTI in the present study was 46.2% (6/13); similar rates of 42% and 44% were reported in other studies.[16],[30] Relapses/recurrences occur due to the persistence of the organism in the urinary tract and are associated with renal scars, stones, prostatitis, or the primary immunosuppressive regimen which might itself contribute to relapse.[31]

Factors contributing to reinfection in these patients could be the same as those for community-acquired UTI; frequent voiding, hydration, and voiding after sexual intercourse in women could be advised to reduce the reinfections.

Carbapenem resistance was observed only among the E. coli isolates (62.5%;5/8) whereas K. pneumoniae was the major multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogen in other studies.[13],[32],[33]

About 46.6% of the isolates were ESBL producers and were uniformly distributed in the 1st year of transplantation whereas the CR isolates were significantly more common in the 1st month of transplantation (P = 0.0020). Origuen et al. compared a cohort of patients between 2002 and 2004 with another cohort between 2011 and 2013 and observed the progressive increase in MDR pathogens, ESBL producers from 43.9% to 67.8% and 6.6% to 26.1%, respectively.

In the present study, all the Gram-negative organisms isolated within 1 month of transplantation were CR E. coli, sensitive to colistin. Combination antibiotic therapy with colistin as the most active agent along with high-dose carbapenems, aminoglycosides, or fosfomycin has been tried in most CR infections.[34],[35] Strict hand hygiene, decontamination of environmental surfaces and cohorting of patient care staff have been shown to reduce the CR infection rate and should be meticulously practiced in all the centers.[36],[37],[38] However, screening for bowel colonization with ESBL, ampC beta-lactamase, or carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria in patients awaiting solid organ transplantation is not recommended except in outbreak situations.[39]


  Conclusion Top


UTI is the common infectious complication in renal transplant patients. The high rate of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the early posttransplant period is a point of concern, especially with cadaver transplants. Infection control practices and catheter care need to be strictly monitored to minimize the risk for UTI.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Khosravi AD, Abasi Montazeri E, Ghorbani A, Parhizgari N. Bacterial urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients and their antibiotic resistance pattern: A four-year study. Iran J Microbiol 2014;6:74-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ram R, Dakshina Murty KV, Prasad N. Time table of infections after renal transplantation – South Indian experience. Indian J Nephrol 2005;15 Suppl 2:S14-21.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
John GT. Infections after renal transplantation in India. Indian J Nephrol 2003;13:14-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
  [Full text]  
4.
Sharma KK, Ayyagiri A, Dhole TN, Prasad KN, Kishore J. Prevalence of infections in renal transplant recipients of North India. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2007;50:453-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Umesh L, Mahesh E, Kumar A, Punith K, Lalitha K, Suman G. Infections in renal transplant recipients. J Indian Acad Clin Med 2007;8:316-23.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Graversen ME, Dalgaard LS, Jensen-Fangel S, Jespersen B, Østergaard L, Søgaard OS. Risk and outcome of pyelonephritis among renal transplant recipients. BMC Infect Dis 2016;16:264.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Giessing M. Urinary tract infection in renal transplantation. Arab J Urol 2012;10:162-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Church DL. Can a silent kidney infection or genetic predisposition underlie recurrent UTIs? Medscape Womens Health 1996;1:6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Alangaden GJ, Thyagarajan R, Gruber SA, Morawski K, Garnick J, El-Amm JM, et al. Infectious complications after kidney transplantation: Current epidemiology and associated risk factors. Clin Transplant 2006;20:401-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
de Souza RM, Olsburgh J. Urinary tract infection in the renal transplant patient. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol 2008;4:252-64.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Jha V. Post-transplant infections: An ounce of prevention. Indian J Nephrol 2010;20:171-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
12.
Papasotiriou M, Savvidaki E, Kalliakmani P, Papachristou E, Marangos M, Fokaefs E, et al. Predisposing factors to the development of urinary tract infections in renal transplant recipients and the impact on the long-term graft function. Ren Fail 2011;33:405-10.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Menegueti MG, Pereira MF, Bellissimo-Rodrigues F, Garcia TM, Saber LT, Nardim ME, et al. Study of the risk factors related to acquisition of urinary tract infections in patients submitted to renal transplant. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2015;48:285-90.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Lim JH, Cho JH, Lee JH, Park YJ, Jin S, Park GY, et al. Risk factors for recurrent urinary tract infection in kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 2013;45:1584-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Gondos AS, Al-Moyed KA, Al-Robasi AB, Al-Shamahy HA, Alyousefi NA. Urinary tract infection among renal transplant recipients in Yemen. PLoS One 2015;10:e0144266.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Camargo LF, Esteves AB, Ulisses LR, Rivelli GG, Mazzali M. Urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: Incidence, risk factors, and impact on graft function. Transplant Proc 2014;46:1757-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Wu X, Dong Y, Liu Y, Li Y, Sun Y, Wang J, et al. The prevalence and predictive factors of urinary tract infection in patients undergoing renal transplantation: A meta-analysis. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:1261-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Maraha B, Bonten H, van Hooff H, Fiolet H, Buiting AG, Stobberingh EE. Infectious complications and antibiotic use in renal transplant recipients during a 1-year follow-up. Clin Microbiol Infect 2001;7:619-25.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Schmidt A, Oberbaum R. Bacterial and fungal infections after kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Urol 1999;9:45-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Säemann M, Hörl WH. Urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients. Eur J Clin Invest 2008;38 Suppl 2:58-65.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Ersoy A, Aktas N, Oruc A, Gul B, Yildiz A, Ayar Y, et al. Analysis of risk factors associated with urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients. 52nd ERA-EDTA Congress. London: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2015:634-61. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv202.7.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Elkehili IM, Kekli AB, Zaak AS, Salem EL. Urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients. Arab J Nephrol Transplant 2010;3:53-5.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Golebiewska JE, Debska-Slizien A, Rutkowski B. Urinary tract infections during the first year after renal transplantation: One center's experience and a review of the literature. Clin Transplant 2014;28:1263-70.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Khoury JA, Brennan DC. Infectious complications in kidney transplant recipients: Review of the literature. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2005;16:453-97.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
25.
Iqbal T, Naqvi R, Akhter SF. Frequency of urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients and effect on graft function. J Pak Med Assoc 2010;60:826-9.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Galindo Sacristán P, Pérez Marfil A, Osorio Moratalla JM, de Gracia Guindo C, Ruiz Fuentes C, Castilla Barbosa YA, et al. Predictive factors of infection in the first year after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 2013;45:3620-3.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Bleyer AJ, Burkart JM, Russell GB, Adams PL. Dialysis modality and delayed graft function after cadaveric renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999;10:154-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Ostaszewska A, Wszoła M, Kuthan R, Domagała P, Góralski P, Diuwe P, et al. Urinary tract infection in patients after renal transplantation: Evaluation of risk factors. MEDtube Sci 2014;2:22-9.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Barber AE, Norton JP, Spivak AM, Mulvey MA. Urinary tract infections: Current and emerging management strategies. Clin Infect Dis 2013;57:719-24.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Bantar C, Fernández Canigia L, Díaz C, Ibáñez C, Soto M, Smayevsky J, et al. Clinical, epidemiologic, and microbiologic study of urinary infection in patients with renal transplant at a specialized center in Argentina. Arch Esp Urol 1993;46:473-7.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Cattell WR. The localization urinary tract infection and its relationship to relapse, reinfection and treatment. In: Brumfitt W, Asscher AW, editor. Urinary Tract Infection. London: Oxford University Press; 1973. p. 206-14.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Silva C, Afonso N, Macário F, Alves R, Mota A. Recurrent urinary tract infections in kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 2013;45:1092-5.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Origüen J, Fernández-Ruiz M, López-Medrano F, Ruiz-Merlo T, González E, Morales JM, et al. Progressive increase of resistance in Enterobacteriaceae urinary isolates from kidney transplant recipients over the past decade: Narrowing of the therapeutic options. Transpl Infect Dis 2016;18:575-84.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Clancy CJ, Chen L, Shields RK, Zhao Y, Cheng S, Chavda KD, et al. Epidemiology and molecular characterization of bacteremia due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2013;13:2619-33.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Bergamasco MD, Barroso Barbosa M, de Oliveira Garcia D, Cipullo R, Moreira JC, Baia C, et al. Infection with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae in solid organ transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 2012;14:198-205.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Munoz-Price LS, Hayden MK, Lolans K, Won S, Calvert K, Lin M, et al. Successful control of an outbreak of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae at a long-term acute care hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:341-7.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Kochar S, Sheard T, Sharma R, Hui A, Tolentino E, Allen G, et al. Success of an infection control program to reduce the spread of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:447-52.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Schwaber MJ, Lev B, Israeli A, Solter E, Smollan G, Rubinovitch B, et al. Containment of a country-wide outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Israeli hospitals via a nationally implemented intervention. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:848-55.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Cervera C, van Delden C, Gavaldà J, Welte T, Akova M, Carratalà J; ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts. Multidrug-resistant bacteria in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20 Suppl 7:49-73.  Back to cited text no. 39
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Colistin (Polymyxin E) Use in Abdominal Solid Organ
Radhika T. Krishnakumar, Amrita Asok, Zubair U. Mohamed, Uma D. Padma, Dipu T. Sathyapalan, Merlin Moni, Sabarish Balachandran, Anil V. Kumar, Rajesh Nair, Surendran Sudhindran, Sanjeev K. Singh
Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2022; : 0897190022
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Perspectives on ability to work from patients’ receiving dialysis and caregivers: analysis of data from the global SONG initiative
Ramya Rajkumar, Amanda Baumgart, Adam Martin, Allison Tong, Nicole Evangelidis, Karine E. Manera, Yeoungjee Cho, David W. Johnson, Andrea Viecelli, Jenny Shen, Chandana Guha, Nicole Scholes-Robertson, Martin Howell, Jonathan C. Craig
Journal of Nephrology. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Urinary Tract Infections in the First 6 Months after Renal Transplantation
Ziad Arabi, Khalefa Al Thiab, Abdulrahman Altheaby, Ghaleb Aboalsamh, Samy Kashkoush, Mohamad Almarastani, Mohammed F. Shaheen, Abdulrahman Altamimi, Wael O’hali, Khalid Bin Saad, Lina Alnajjar, Rawan Alhussein, Raghad Almuhiteb, Bashayr Alqahtani, Rayana Alotaibi, Marah Alqahtani, Mohammed Tawhari, Martin Sedlacek
International Journal of Nephrology. 2021; 2021: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Five compelling UTI questions after kidney transplant
Selda Aydin, Abhijit Patil, Mahesh Desai, Nasser Simforoosh
World Journal of Urology. 2020; 38(11): 2733
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

© Indian Journal of Nephrology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 20th Sept '07