Advertisment

Indian Journal of Nephrology About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Current Issue | Archives| Ahead of print | Search |Instructions |  Editorial Board  

Users Online:349

Official publication of the Indian Society of Nephrology
  Search
 
  
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~Related articles
 ~  Article in PDF (636 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
   Abstract
  Background
  Material and Methods
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed568    
    Printed16    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded25    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 32  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 216-222
 

COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients: Experience from a Western Indian center


Department of Nephrology, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center and Institute of Transplant Sciences (IKDRC-ITS), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Date of Submission19-Dec-2020
Date of Acceptance03-Aug-2021
Date of Web Publication30-Dec-2021

Correspondence Address:
Divyesh P Engineer
Department of Nephrology, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center and Institute of Transplant Sciences (IKDRC-ITS), Ahmedabad, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_575_20

Rights and Permissions

  Abstract 


Introduction: Chronic kidney disease patients on hemodialysis (CKD-5D) are among the worst hit by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Need to travel for dialysis, comorbidities, and immunosuppressive state put them at risk of severe disease and poor outcomes. We report our experience of COVID-19 in a cohort of CKD-5D from a public sector tertiary-care center from western India. Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 58 CKD-5D patients with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to our COVID-19 hospital. Suspected COVID-19, acute kidney injury (AKI), or AKI on CKD were excluded. We studied the clinical, demographic, radiological, and laboratory profiles; treatment; and outcomes of the patients. We assessed the potential clinical and laboratory parameters to predict mortality. Results: The mean age of the patients was 48.7 ± 16.9 years, with 55% males. Comorbidities included hypertension (65%), diabetes (19%), and cardiovascular disease (15.5%). The presenting features included fever (69%), respiratory distress (50%), upper respiratory symptoms (36%), and diarrhea (13%). Five (8.6%) were asymptomatic. Bilateral infiltrates on chest imaging were the commonest radiological pattern. The patients were managed with oxygenation, hydroxychloroquine, steroids, anticoagulation, remdesivir, and favipiravir. Twenty-two (37.9%) patients died, predominantly due to respiratory failure. Disease severity and C-reactive protein (CRP) above 175 mg/L at admission were the only parameters predictive of mortality. Conclusion: CKD-5D patients with COVID-19 were less likely to present with the classical syndrome of fever and respiratory distress compared with reports from the general population and had higher mortality. Only disease severity and high CRP (>175 mg/L) were predictive of mortality in our cohort.


Keywords: Coronavirus, COVID-19, dialysis, ESRD, mortality, outcomes


How to cite this article:
Banerjee S, Patel HV, Engineer DP, Gupta V, Patel H, Gupta A, Shah PR, Kute VB. COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients: Experience from a Western Indian center. Indian J Nephrol 2022;32:216-22

How to cite this URL:
Banerjee S, Patel HV, Engineer DP, Gupta V, Patel H, Gupta A, Shah PR, Kute VB. COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients: Experience from a Western Indian center. Indian J Nephrol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Jun 26];32:216-22. Available from: https://www.indianjnephrol.org/text.asp?2022/32/3/216/334445



  Background Top


The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is ongoing since December 2019, affecting lives around the world. More than 46 million cases and 1.1 million deaths have been reported worldwide, and India has reported 8 million cases and more than 120,000 deaths as on November 1, 2020[1],[2] The epidemic is not over yet, with several parts of the world reporting second surges, and continued preparedness of the health care system is important.

Most deaths from COVID-19 have been reported in the elderly and in those with comorbidities or an immunosuppressed state. Hypertension, diabetes, and chronic pulmonary, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular diseases have been reported as major risk factors for patients with COVID-19. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hemodialysis (HD) have been associated with worse outcomes in some but not all previous reports.[3],[4] In this single-center hospital-based study from western India, we retrospectively evaluated the clinico-demographic variables, laboratory parameters, and outcomes of CKD-5D patients with COIVD-19. We sought to identify the important predictors of mortality in this cohort.


  Material and Methods Top


Setting

When the pandemic hit India, the western Indian state of Gujarat was affected early and reported high death rates (about 5% against a national average of 3.27% as of May 1, 2020). In mid-May 2020, the patient numbers continued to spike, and public sector subspecialty hospitals (like our kidney institute) were made COVID-19 hospitals. Adoption of home quarantine policy meant only the sick patients got hospitalized. Our 190-bed COVID-19 facility had 50 intensive care unit beds and 70 beds with oxygen facility. The management was headed by nephrologists and intensivists. Only emergency nephrology and urology services remained functional as per government advisory. Our facility provided bedside dialysis for 100 + beds and created an outpatient dialysis unit for COVID-19 suspected patients, and asymptomatic COVID-19 cases were advised home quarantine. In the first week of July, when the epidemic plateaued, the institute ceased to be a COVID-19 hospital and admitted only patients with COVID-19 and renal disease (primarily post kidney transplant cases).

Case definition and management protocols

A case was defined as a person with real-time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)– confirmed COVID-19 infection, irrespective of signs and symptoms. Cases were labeled as mild when patients had oxygen saturation (SpO2) above 94%, moderate when SpO2 was 90% to 94%, and severe when SpO2 was below 90%.[5] The patients underwent basic investigations and investigations to determine prognosis. Most patients received hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), azithromycin, ascorbic acid, and symptomatic treatment as per the government guidelines.[6],[7] Unfractionated heparin was used as 5,000 units subcutaneously twice a day in high-risk patients and thrice a day in those with severe disease, unless contraindicated. Patients requiring oxygen support were given intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate (MPSS, 1 mg/kg in two divided doses). At the end of May 2020, tocilizumab became available and was used based on laboratory features suggesting cytokine storm (given as 400 mg single-dose infusion over 1 hour).[6] Favipiravir became available in the third week of June. It was used as 1,800 mg twice a day on the first day and 800 mg twice a day for the next 6 days. Remdesivir (200 mg on Day 1 and 100 mg daily for 5–10 days) and convalescent plasma were used starting from mid-July. Other agents such as ivermectin and doxycycline were not used.

Records of all the patients admitted with COVID-19 infection were screened. Patients who were known to have chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis (CKD-5D) for at least 1 month before admission were included in the study. COVID-19-suspect patients, those with AKI or AKI superimposed on CKD, and those with incomplete information were excluded. The primary aim was to study the clinical outcomes of such patients. We also attempted to identify the prognostic epidemiological and laboratory markers in our cohort.

Based on the previous studies, we studied age, dialysis vintage, saturation on room air at presentation, absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, D-dimer levels, Serum ferritin, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and length of hospital stay as potential prognostic factors in our cohort. Peak levels of D-dimer, ferritin, and CRP levels were also evaluated as markers of prognosis. We divided our cohort into an initial phase (first 25 admissions, over the first 3 weeks) and a later phase (beyond 3 weeks) and studied the mortality in each quartile to understand the change of trends over time.

Statistical methods

The results were expressed as numbers with percentages, mean ± standard deviation or median with range as appropriate. The comparison between survivors and non-survivors was done by Student t test, Mann–Whitney U test, Chi-square test, or Fischer's exact test as justified. The effect of various putative prognostic factors was evaluated by binary logistic regression. A P value of <0.05 was taken as significant. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20 (Armonk, NY, IBM Corp.).


  Results Top


A total of 913 patients were admitted to our COVID-19 hospital between May 13, 2020, and July 2, 2020. Subsequently, from July 3, 2020, a total of 242 patients with CKD and posttransplant patients were admitted. A total of 593 patients were COVID-19 positive by RT-PCR test. We identified 76 patients with known CKD fulfilling the inclusion criteria. After exclusions, 58 patients were included in the final analysis.

The demographic and clinical profiles are presented in [Table 1]. There were more males in our cohort, with a median dialysis vintage of 18 months. Twenty-two patients had no urine output at baseline. Fourteen patients were recorded to have a decrease in urine output after COVID-19 infection, five became anuric, whereas nine developed oliguria. Eighteen patients had no change in urine output. Data were missing in four patients. Five (8.6%) patients were asymptomatic, detected by screening for surgical or vascular access procedures. Fever and upper respiratory symptoms were the commonest presenting features. Data pertaining to other minor symptoms such as anosmia, loss of taste, conjunctivitis, and rash were not available in a lot of patients. This deficit probably reflects the sheer overwhelming number of patients, severity of cases at presentation, and lack of properly trained manpower. Half (50%) the patients had respiratory distress at presentation. One third of the patients had severe disease at presentation. Most (84.5%) patients had bilateral lung infiltrates on the X-ray of the chest. The laboratory parameters of the patients at presentation are described in [Table 2].
Table 1: Epidemiology of patients included in the study

Click here to view
Table 2: Laboratory parameters of the entire cohort

Click here to view


Twelve (20.7%) patients never needed oxygen during their hospital course. The modalities of oxygen supplementation in the remaining patients are shown in [Table 3]. Most patients received oxygen via prongs, masks, or non-rebreathing masks. High-flow nasal canula, noninvasive or mechanical ventilation was required in six (10%) cases. Outlines of management provided are presented in [Table 3].
Table 3: Summary of therapeutic interventions

Click here to view


There were 22 deaths (37.9%) in the dialysis subpopulation compared with 149 deaths among 593 total hospitalized patients (25.1%, P = 0.041 for intergroup difference). There was a significant difference in the death rates between the patients admitted in the first 3 weeks (14 deaths out of 25 admissions) and those admitted later (eight deaths out of 33 admissions, P = 0.017). The probability of in-hospital deaths correlated with the disease severity at presentation (mortality 33% for mild and 58.3% for severe disease, P = 0.03). CRP levels above 175 mg/L were also significantly associated with mortality (P = 0.04). No other demographic, clinical, or laboratory parameters affected the probability of in-hospital mortality [Table 4]. We excluded the asymptomatic and mild cases and evaluated the effect of all the potential prognostic markers; none of the parameters were predictive of mortality in these subgroups. In the 16 patients with severe disease, where interleukin (IL)-6 levels were available, there was a significant difference between survivors and non-survivors (P = 0.03) [Table 4].
Table 4: Comparison of potential prognostic markers among survivors and nonsurvivors

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Our study presents a single-center, public sector experience of management of CKD-5D patients hospitalized with COVID-19. As of writing of this article, no other detailed study from India has been published in this subgroup of patients. CKD-5D patients faced unique health issues during the pandemic. Such patients are burdened with high comorbidity loads such as age, diabetes, hypertension, obesity or malnutrition, cardiac comorbidities, and immunosuppressed state.[8] The necessity to travel for life-saving dialysis made lockdown restrictions impractical for HD patients.

Clinical profile

The first report of hemodialysis patients with COVID-19 came from Wuhan. In this study, most cases had mild to moderate disease and 21% were asymptomatic, and symptomatic patients were also less likely to have classic features such as fever, cough, or respiratory symptoms compared with the general population.[9],[10],[11] Another Chinese study reported that the disease was milder in HD patients, possibly due to their impaired cellular immunity.[4] Two Spanish cohorts also reported the initial presentation to be milder in the HD cohort.[12],[13] These are in agreement with our findings. Twenty-eight (48.3%) had minimal or no symptoms and one third of patients had severe disease at presentation in our study. A pervious observational study from India reported relatively more asymptomatic cases (35.1%) and a similar number of moderate and severe disease presentations compared to our cohort. However, the details of the treatment or laboratory features have not been provided in this report.[14] A major observation of their cohort was that many patients missed their dialysis as they were turned away by dialysis centers.

Most COVID-19 patients (82%–85%) develop bilateral radiological abnormalities.[4],[10] Seven (12.1%) patients had normal X-rays at admission in our study. Normal chest X-rays have been reported in COVID-19 patients from the hemodialysis as well as the general population.[4],[15]

Treatment

There was initial enthusiasm as well as safety concerns (especially in hemodialysis) around the combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin.[16],[17] Corticosteroids were successfully used in the management of COVID-19 patients with severe disease.[18],[19] The RECOVERY trial and, more recently, the METCOVID (Methylprednisolone in the Treatment of Patients With Signs of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome in COVID-19) study contrasting results with corticosteroids.[20],[21] Anticoagulation was also shown to have clinical benefit in COVID-19 patients with severe disease.[22],[23] Other therapeutic modalities including antivirals (remdesivir and favipiravir), tocilizumab, and convalescent plasma were also found beneficial in small cohorts.[24],[25],[26],[27] In our study, the number of patients on each therapy was small, and it was not designed to compare the efficacy of treatment protocols.

We monitored the corrected QT interval (QTc) in all patients and found the combination of HCQ and azithromycin safe in our cohort. We followed patients with blood counts, CRP, procalcitonin, X-ray chest, and blood culture while they were on steroids or tocilizumab. No attributable worsening was found. The safety of remdesivir is not established in advanced renal failure. We used remdesivir in our patients without any dose modification. We observed no elevation in hepatic transaminases or infusion reactions with remdesivir (n = 4) in our cohort.

Outcomes

As per the World Health Organization data, mortality from COVID-19 is 2.9%.[1] Severe disease has been associated with higher mortality (around 40%).[28] Smaller cohorts from China reported moderately high (16.2%) deaths in hemodialysis patients, all in non-ICU patients. They emphasized the importance of comorbidities in the mortality associated with COVID-19 in HD patients.[29] A subsequent study of hemodialysis patients from Spain observed 30.5% mortality in the whole cohort. The patients who had severe disease had higher death rates (61.1%). These trends are reflected in our cohort almost exactly. The Indian cohort had an identical death rate (37.8%) compared with our study.[14]

Predictors of prognosis

The previous studies have reported age, dialysis vintage, comorbidities, high serum levels of blood urea nitrogen, CRP, LDH, ferritin, high leucocyte counts, and lymphopenia to predict death in COVID-19 patients on dialysis.[30],[31] However, inconsistency in published evidence does exist. Other studies in hemodialysis patients have found none of the laboratory parameters at admission predict in-hospital mortality.[12],[32] A French cohort reported LDH over two times the upper normal and CRP more than 175 mg/dL predict mortality.[33] In comparison, Goicoechea et al.[12] reported mean CRP levels as low as 18.7 mg/dL in non-survivors.

We found higher mortality in the initial 3 weeks of functioning as a COVID-19 hospital. The initial high mortality rates may be attributed to delay in diagnosis, limited availability of testing and drugs, fear and misinformation, and poor logistic support. Although resource limitation in health care staffing, testing, and medical management was universal during the pandemic, it was more common in the developing world.

Limitations of our study include a retrospective design and a small sample size. Inclusion was hospital based and does not include data from asymptomatic patients on dialysis because they were not routinely screened with RT-PCR or COVID-19 antigen testing. Patients with normal chest X-rays may have shown abnormal findings in a computed tomography (CT) thorax. However, a CT scan was not done routinely and hence not reported here. Treatment protocols with COVID-19 patients were continuously evolving at the time of the study.


  Conclusion Top


The COVID-19 pandemic poses serious problems for the hemodialysis population. Mortality rates in this subpopulation were significantly higher than the average in-hospital death rates. Although in unselected cohorts several clinical and laboratory markers are known to be associated with mortality, only clinical severity and a few biomarkers significantly correlated with mortality in our cohort. Further studies and analysis of registry data may help clarify certain limitations of the study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2020. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/. [Last accessed on 2020 Nov 01].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Arogya Setu Website. Available from: https://aarogyasetu.gov.in/https://covid19.who.int/. [Last accessed on 2020 Nov 01].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Wang B, Li R, Lu Z, Huang Y. Does comorbidity increase the risk of patients with COVID-19: Evidence from meta-analysis. Aging (Albany NY) 2020;12:6049-57.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Wu J, Li J, Zhu G, Zhang Y, Bi Z, Yu Y, et al. Clinical features of maintenance hemodialysis patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020;15:1139-45.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Revised Guidelines on Clinical Management of COVID – 19. Government of India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Directorate General of Health Services (EMR Division). Published 31.03.2020. https://www.mohfw.gov.in/pdf/RevisedNationalClinicalManagementGuideline forCOVID1931032020.pdf. [Last accessed 2020 Sep 26].  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Clinical Management Protocol: Covid-19. Government of India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Directorate General of Health Services (EMR Division). Version 5. Published 03.07.2020. https://www.mohfw.gov.in/pdf/UpdatedClinicalManagement ProtocolforCOVID19dated03072020.pdf. [Last accessed 2020 Sep 26].  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Clinical Management Protocol: COVID-19. Government of India. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Directorate General of Health Services (EMR Division). Version 3. Published13.06.2020.https://www.mohfw.gov.in/pdf/ClinicalManagementProtocolforCOVID19.pdf. [Last acessed 2020 Sep 26].  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Lee WC, Lee YT, Li LC, Ng HY, Kuo WH, Lin PT, et al. The number of comorbidities predicts renal outcomes in patients with stage 3–5 chronic kidney disease. J Clin Med 2018;7:493.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Xiong F, Tang H, Liu L, Tu C, Tian JB, Lei CT, et al. Clinical characteristics of and medical interventions for COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients in Wuhan, China. J Am Soc Nephrol 2020;31:1387-97.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Guan W-J, Ni Z-Y, Hu Y, Liang W-H, Ou C-Q, He J-X, et al.; China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1708-20.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020;323:1061-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Goicoechea M, Cámara LA, Macías N, de Morales AM, Rojas ÁG, Bascuñana A, et al. COVID-19: Clinical course and outcomes of 36 hemodialysis patients in Spain. Kidney Int 2020;98:27-34.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Albalate M, Arribas P, Torres E, Cintra M, Alcázar R, Puerta M, et al. High prevalence of asymptomatic COVID-19 in hemodialysis. Daily learning during first month of COVID-19 pandemic. Nefrologia 2020;40:279-286.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Trivedi M, Shingada A, Shah M, Khanna U, Karnik ND, Ramachandran R. Impact of COVID-19 on maintenance haemodialysis patients: The Indian scenario. Nephrology 2020;25:929-32.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Wong HY, Lam HY, Fong AH, Leung ST, Chin TW, Lo CS, et al. Frequency and distribution of chest radiographic findings in COVID-19 positive patients. Radiology 2020;296:E72-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, Hoang VT, Meddeb L, Mailhe M, et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: Results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020;56:105949.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Giaime P, Guenoun M, Pedinielli N, Narbonne H, Bergounioux JP, Solas C, et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin tolerance in haemodialysis patients during COVID-19 infection. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020;35:1346-53.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Wang Y, Jiang W, He Q, Wang C, Wang B, Zhou P, et al. A retrospective cohort study of methylprednisolone therapy in severe patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2020;5:57-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Fadel R, Morrison AR, Vahia A, Smith ZR, Chaudhry Z, Bhargava P, et al.; Henry ford COVID-19 management task force. Early short-course corticosteroids in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:2114-20.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
RECOVERY Collaborative Group; Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, Linsell L, et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19-preliminary report. N Engl J Med 2020;384:693-704.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Jeronimo CMP, Farias MEL, Val FFA, Sampaio VS, Alexandre MAA, Melo GC, et al.; Metcovid Team. Methylprednisolone as adjunctive therapy for patients hospitalized with COVID-19: A randomised, double-blind, phase IIb, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 2021;72:e373-81.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Tang N, Bai H, Chen X, Gong J, Li D, Sun Z. Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. J Thromb Haemost 2020;18:1094-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Paranjpe I, Fuster V, Lala A, Russak AJ, Glicksberg BS, Levin MA, et al. Association of treatment dose anticoagulation with in-hospital survival among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:122-4.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Grein J, Ohmagari N, Shin D, Diaz G, Asperges E, Castagna A, et al. Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020;382:2327-36.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Wang Y, Zhang D, Du G, Du R, Zhao J, Jin Y, et al. Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet 2020;395:1569-78.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Luo P, Liu Y, Qiu L, Liu X, Liu D, Li J. Tocilizumab treatment in COVID-19: A single center experience. J Med Virol 2020;92:814-8.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Shen C, Wang Z, Zhao F, Yang Y, Li J, Yuan J, et al. Treatment of 5 critically ill patients with COVID-19 with convalescent plasma. JAMA 2020;323:1582-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Shang Y, Liu T, Wei Y, Li J, Shao L, Liu M, et al. Scoring systems for predicting mortality for severe patients with COVID-19. EClinicalMedicine 2020;24:100426.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Ma Y, Diao B, Lv X, Liang W, Zhu J, Liu L, et al. COVID-19 in hemodialysis (HD) patients: Report from one HD center in Wuhan, China. MedRxiv 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.02.24.20027201.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Valeri AM, Robbins-Juarez SY, Stevens JS, Ahn W, Rao MK, Radhakrishnan J, et al. Presentation and outcomes of patients with ESKD and COVID-19. J Am Soc Nephrol 2020;31:1409-15.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Ng JH, Hirsch JS, Wanchoo R, Sachdeva M, Sakhiya V, Hong S, et al. Outcomes of patients with end-stage kidney disease hospitalized with COVID-19. Kidney Int 2020;98:1530-9.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Aydin Bahat K, Parmaksiz E, Sert S. The clinical characteristics and course of COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients. Hemodial Int 2020;24:534-40.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Tortonese S, Scriabine I, Anjou L, Loens C, Michon A, Benabdelhak M, et al. COVID-19 in patients on maintenance dialysis in the Paris region. Kidney Int Rep 2020;5:1535-44.  Back to cited text no. 33
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

Indian Journal of Nephrology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 20th Sept '07